Legal Opinion

The Miguel Di Larrinaga

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 9, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Admiralty. Action by the Guantanamo Sugar Company against the steamship Miguel di Larrinaga. Dismissed.

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, District Judge.

'Libelant was consignee and owner of certain heavy machinery, which had been transported on this British steamer from Liverpool to Guantanamo. While one heavy piece was being put ashore at the latter port, a stay, broke. This permitted the mast to buckle, and the boom from which the machine hung to settle, so that the hanging piece of metal came down on another machine, to the injury of both. The machinery had been taken aboard at Liverpool in the same way, and with , the same stay, mast, and boom. Examination showed the stay to be worn. No recent inspection of it is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cuba Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Middleton & Co. (Canada), Ltd. v. Ocean Dominion S. S. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API