Legal Opinion

Ameranth, Inc. v. Brink Software, Inc., a California corporation; and Par Technology Corporation, a Delaware corporation

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 5, 2026No. 3:25-cv-02302Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 Case No.: 3:25-cv-2302-RSH-BLM AMERANTH, INC. 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 12 MOTION TO REMAND v. 13 [ECF No. 20] BRINK SOFTWARE, INC., a California 14 corporation; and PAR TECHNOLOGY 15 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 16 Defendants. 17 AND RELATED CROSS-COMPLAINT 18 19 20 Before the Court is a motion to remand filed by plaintiff Ameranth, Inc. 21 (“Ameranth”). ECF No. 20. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court finds the 22 motion presented appropriate for resolution without oral…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. SchachtSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API