Legal Opinion

Channon v. Kerber

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 9, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Elliott Anthony, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtShepabd, J.

This was an action in assumpsit upon a written contract whereby the appellee was bound to build and complete the necessary cut stone work for a residence for the appellant, resulting in a verdict and judgment against appellant. Numerous errors are assigned, but we are of opinion that, aside from the alleged errors contained in the instructions to the jury, there is but one that can be sustained. The specifications mentioned in the contract provide that the stone shall be “ of the very best quality, Yert Island (McArthur) brown stone, free from defects. All stones to be selected in the very…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburg Railroad v. HutchinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Volk v. RocheIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Sherman v. DutchIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Davies v. CobbAppellate Court of Illinois · 1882
  5. Village of Warren v. WrightAppellate Court of Illinois · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Consolidated Perfume Co. v. National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API