Legal Opinion

Citak v. Ohio State Univ.

Ohio Court of Claims

Decided March 11, 2022No. 2021-00563PQPublished

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Citak v. Ohio State Univ.,

2022-Ohio-1195.] RACHEL CITAK Case No. 2021-00563PQ Requester Special Master Jeff Clark v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, OFFICE OF UNIVERSITY COMPLIANCE AND INTEGRITY Respondent {¶1} Ohio’s Public Records Act, R.C. 149.43, provides that upon request a public office “shall make copies of the requested public record available to the requester at cost and within a reasonable period of time.” R.C. 149.43(B)(1). Ohio courts construe the Public Records Act liberally in favor of broad access, with any doubt resolved in favor of disclosure of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-KelleyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Hurt v. Liberty Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API