State v. Small
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
CRICHTON, J.,
additionally concurs and assigns reasons.
hi agree with the majority's denial of the writ; however, because of the frequency with which the issue arises, I write separately to clarify whether or not the law currently requires sentencing courts to advise defendants who plead guilty to an offense of the future sentence enhancement exposure the plea may engender.
By statute, during a plea colloquy, a sentencing judge must ascertain whether or not a defendant understands “[t]he nature of the charge to which the plea is offered, the mandatory minimum penalty provided by law, if any, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- State v. NuccioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- State v. MuseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- State v. VerdinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. CooleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- State v. FloydLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- State v. MosleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- State v. CasadayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- State v. KellyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.