Legal Opinion

Wong Tin Look v. Goo Wan Hoy

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1915Published

Exceptions ejrom Circuit Court, Eirst Circuit. Hon. T. B. Stuart, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

QUARLES, J.

January 14, 1913, J. J. Byrne, assignee of O. Q. Yee Hop & Co., commenced an action of assumpsit against Lee Chan, Young Chan, Lee Look, Lee Nan and L. O. Akana, alleging them to be co-partners doing business under the firm name and style of Hang Eong Company, and sued out a writ of attachment which was, on said day, levied upon certain chattels belong*541ing to the partnership. January 15, 1913, the defendants, Lee Chan and Young Ohan, doing business as co-partners under the name and style of Hang Fong Company, as principals, ,and Wong Tin Look, plaintiff here,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Newell v. Norton and ShipSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. Waldrop v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. WaterhouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Hood v. MathisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API