Bizer v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, District Judge.
Defendant moves for summary judgment claiming that the record shows without any factual controversy that the claim is barred by the two years statute of limitations found in the Federal Tort Claims Act.
This is an action for malpractice against the United States arising out of a eystoscopic examination performed on the plaintiff by a government doctor at the U. S. Public Health Service Hospital at San Francisco some four years prior to the date of filing suit. The complaint alleges that during the examination plaintiff’s bladder was negligently punctured causing damage…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Stafford v. ShultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Maryland Ex Rel. Burkhardt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lee Quinton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Wilroy ReidCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Paul Eugene Tessier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- Rex E. Jordan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Celestino Mendiola, Jr., and Maryland Casualty Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.