Legal Opinion

United States v. John Doe. In the Matter of Grand Jury Proceeding: Application of Daniel Ellsberg for Protective Order

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 11, 1972No. 72-1021PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Daniel Ellsberg, a defendant in a pending criminal prosecution initiated by an indictment in the Central District of California, seeks a protective order barring a grand jury sitting in the District of Massachusetts (Boston) from gathering evidence which would be relevant to his trial in California. The district court denied the motion, basing its decision on the prosecution’s representation “that its purpose in calling witnesses [in Boston] is not to obtain testimony or other evidence tending to prove the charge or charges [in California] but to determine whether any…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. United States v. Cara Woods, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. William N. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  3. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated January 2, 1985 (Robert M. Simels, Esq.) Donald Payden, Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. United States ex rel., L.C.J. v. VanArtsdaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Vincent Moran DossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API