Legal Opinion

Baker v. Struck

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.

The plaintiff’s testator died,- having made a

contract for the purchase of real property, and this action has been brought for the specific performance of the‘contract. It was the duty of the executrix under this situation to make the payments under the contract, even though the benefit accrued to her individually under the will. These payments of course would be made out of the personal estate and would deplete the personal estate of that extent. Under such a contract the title remains in the vendor, in trust for the purchaser, while the equitable estate is in the vendee. At the death of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morgan's Heirs v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  2. Champion v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  3. Wright v. . HolbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  4. In re Final Accounting & Judicial Settlement of the Estate of DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of KelleherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API