Legal Opinion

United States v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio R.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided March 19, 1948No. Civ. No. 972; Civ. No. 973PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WATSON, District Judge.

These two actions are brought by the United States under the Safety Appliance Acts, 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-16. Specifically in question is the application of Section 2, which reads as follows: “It shall be unlawful for any common carrier engaged in interstate commerce by railroad to haul or permit to be hauled or used on its line any car used in moving interstate traffic not equipped with couplers coupling automatically by impact, and which can be uncoupled without the necessity of men going between the ends of the cars.” The actions were consolidated, as they involve two…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. St. Louis Merchants' Bridge Terminal Ry. Co. v. SchuermanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. HilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API