Legal Opinion
Cummings v. D'oyen, No. Cv94 31 83 10 S (May 3, 1996)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided May 3, 1996No. CV94 31 83 10 SUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO STRIKE (#117) On November 14, 1994, the pro se plaintiff, David Cummings, filed a three count complaint against the defendant, Roberta D'Oyen, seeking to recover for damages allegedly sustained when he was arrested pursuant to a complaint made by the defendant. The plaintiff alleges that he was arrested because the defendant accused him of harassment pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-182b, based on false allegations that he called the defendant on numerous occasions and threatened…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Novametrix Medical Systems, Inc. v. BOC Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Liljedahl Bros. v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.