Legal Opinion

A. Miller & Co. v. Cincinnati Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 23, 1991No. 3-90-0681PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Slater

This is a dispute over the interpretation of an interruption of business clause in an insurance policy. We affirm the trial court, which held for the insurer.

Plaintiff, A. Miller & Company, is engaged in the business of purchasing scrap metal, shredding it, and selling the shredded metal. Plaintiff was insured by defendant Cincinnati Insurance Company, under a policy which included an endorsement providing protection against the interruption of plaintiff’s business. The endorsement stated in part that the defendant agreed:

“1. To pay the insured the amount of Daily Indemnity, [$10,000]…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. BrochuIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Dora Township v. Indiana Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Community State Bank v. Hartford InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Keyser v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lyon Metal Products, L.L.C. v. Protection Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. National Wrecking Company v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Milwaukee Guardian Ins., Inc. v. TaraskaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Phoenix Assur. Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1997
  5. Lyon Metal Products L.L.C. v. Protection Mutual Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API