Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Pacific Automobile Insurance Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1937No. Civ. 11215PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action upon a policy of automobile “public liability” insurance. Under the terms of the policy, if valid and in force at the time of the accident, defendant would have been liable to plaintiff for the amount of his damages, limited, of course, to the amount of the policy, in the event the insured failed to pay such damages. A judgment had been recovered against the insured and execution levied thereon, but it remained unsatisfied at the time this action was commenced.

The policy of insurance was to be effective for a year from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Solomon v. Federal InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Bennett v. Northwestern National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commercial Money Center, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Kindred v. Pacific Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Century Surety Co. v. Crosby InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Allstate Insurance v. McCurryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Republic Indemnity Co. of America v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API