Clausen v. Miller
North Dakota Supreme Court
1OpinionBurr, J.
(On petition for rehearing.) In a petition for rehearing appellant says the court is in error in stating that the respondent in the lower court — the appellant heré — waived compliance with the requirement that specification of the insufficiency of the evidence must set forth the particulars wherein the evidence is said to be insufficient.
There' is nothing in the statement of the case showing any objection by appellant. The statute prescribes how the statement of the case is made and what constitutes this statement. It is the appellant’s duty to see that the statement of the cáse is made up…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erickson v. WiperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- First National Bank v. BremsethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Feil v. Northwest German Farmers Mutual InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Baird v. First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Updegraff v. TuckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.