Legal Opinion

United States v. Franks

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 27, 2004No. 02-4085PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

While investigating Terry Gardner for cocaine trafficking, agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (the “FBI”) taped telephone conversations between Gardner and another man, a number of which ostensibly concerned the sale of Tire Wet, car wax, and air freshener. After his arrest, Gardner identified the other party as Joseph Franks, the defendant/appellant. Gardner claimed that he regularly distributed cocaine to Franks, and he explained that Tire Wet, car wax, and air freshener were code words for cocaine. A jury convicted Franks of conspiracy to distribute cocaine…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Lewis Francis (97-1129) and Louay Francis (97-1130)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Francis A. KoeberleinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Luis A. MontanezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. MontanezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API