Legal Opinion
Loper v. City of Rochester
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 16, 1994PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of defendant-third-party plaintiff, The City of Rochester (City), for a conditional judgment for common-law indemnification against third-party defendant, Hudson Steel Fabricators and Erectors. Periodic inspection of the progress of the work by the City’s assistant architect does not constitute the type of supervision or control necessary to establish the City’s common-law liability for the injuries sustained by plaintiff at the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aragon v. 233 West 21st Street, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Curtis v. 37th Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Allman v. Frank L. Ciminelli Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Paterson v. HennessyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by7 opinions
- Grant v. Gutchess Timberlands, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Gaul v. Motorola, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Baskewicz v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Kingston v. Hunter HighlandsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Eastman v. Volpi Manufacturing USA, Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.