Legal Opinion

Velcro Indus. v. Taiwan Paiho Limited

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided March 2, 2005No. CV-04-242-JDPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Velcro Indus. v . Taiwan Paiho Limited CV-04-242-JD 03/02/05 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Velcro Industries B.V. and Velcro USA Inc. v. N o . 04-242-JD Opinio n N o .

2005 DNH 035

Taiwan Paiho Limited O R D E R The plaintiffs, Velcro Industries B.V. and Velcro U.S.A. Inc. (collectively, “Velcro”), allege that defendant Taiwan Paiho Limited (“Paiho”) has infringed Velcro’s patents for a method of continuously producing a multi-hook fastener member and the member itself, United States Patent Nos. 4,794,028 and 4,872,243. The parties differ over the meanings of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
Ccs Fitness, Inc. v. Brunswick Corporation and Its Division Life FitnessCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. And Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Doing Business as Labcorp)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
B. Braun Medical, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories and Np Medical, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Best Management v. NE FiberglassDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2008