Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nosal v. Collett

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 14, 1968No. 1 CA-CIV 592Published

1DissentHathaway, Chief Judge

Actual notice, alone, is insufficient to vest jurisdiction in the court, Stinson v. Johnson, 3 Ariz.App. 320, 414 P.2d 169 (1966). The trial court properly concluded from the face of the affidavit that service was incomplete. This jurisdictional finding is controlled by and must yield to the return of service as it appears of record, Austin v. Smith, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 97, 312 F.2d 337 (1962); Powell v. Turpin, 224 N.C. 67, 29 S.E.2d 26 (1944).

Quashal of service was upheld in Dusminski v. Ladenheim, 43 F.Supp. 139 (E.D.N.Y.1942), in a very similar situation, •where the court stated:

“ * * * the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clarence Austin v. Otis SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  2. Powell v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Miller v. Corning Glass WorksArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Dusminski v. LadenheimDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942
  5. Kohler v. DerderianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API