Legal Opinion

Moros v. City of Pittsburgh

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1987No. Appeal, No. 3420 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

Joseph and Mary Moros were denied a variance for non-conforming use for two properties by the Pittsburgh Zoning Board of Adjustment. The Moroses sought a fifteen-unit occupancy permit for the combined properties. The Allegheny County Common Pleas Court affirmed. We affirm.

Mary Moros bought 2128 Carey Way in 1947 and the second property, 2130 Carey Way, in 1973. The properties are presently classified R-4 multi-family residential. Each unit contains a sleeping room, a hotplate and refrigerator. One bathroom serves every two units. They are occupied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Knake v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Municipality of Penn Hills v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oakcliffe Community Organization v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Pittsburgh and the City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API