Legal Opinion

Clancy v. Hawkins

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1959No. 34944PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, C. J.

The executor of the estate of Fred S. Clancy, deceased, alleged two causes of action in his complaint: the first, for wrongful death; the second, for funeral expenses. The action was commenced on behalf of the adult children of decedent who died as the result of a collision with defendant’s automobile.

The jury returned a verdict for defendant on the first cause of action, and for plaintiff on the second, in the sum of $1,185.

Appellant (defendant) contends

*811"... that before damages may be awarded for funeral expenses there must be competent evidence upon two points: First,, there must be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Philby v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. In Re Allen's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Dean v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Home Undertaking Co. v. JoliffWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. In Re Allen's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. El-Meswari v. Washington Gas Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  2. Fathalla El-Meswari, Personal Representative of the Estate of Iman El-Meswari, a Minor, Hawa Habil El-Meswari v. Washington Gas Light Company, Davenport Insulation, Inc., Valley Roofing, Inc., West Briar, Inc., Mark Mitchell, Dwight Showalter, Fathalla El-Meswari, Personal Representative of the Estate of Iman El-Meswari, a Minor, Hawa Habil El-Meswari v. Frank Clower and F.M. Clower, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API