Beachman v. Koch & Dreyfus
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the City Court of Decatur, in Equity. Heard before the Hon. Wm. H. Simpson. The facts of this case are sufficiently set forth in the opinion. Upon a final hearing, on the pleadings and proof, the court decreed that the complainants were entitled to the relief prayed, and ordered tliat the sale be set aside.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the City Court of Decatur, in Equity. Heard before the Hon. Wm. H. Simpson. The facts of this case are sufficiently set forth in the opinion. Upon a final hearing, on the pleadings and proof, the court decreed that the complainants were entitled to the relief prayed, and ordered tliat the sale be set aside. This decree is here assigned as error. cited Shealy v. Edwards, 75 Ala. 411; Pickett v. Pipkin, 64 Ala. 520; Marshall v. Croom, 52 Ala. 555. Knowles v. Street, 87 Ala. 361 ; Carter Bros. c& Co. v. Coleman, 84 Ala. 256; Rankin v. Vandiver, 78 Ala. 562; Wait on Fraudulent…
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
The bill was filed by appellees, as creditors of J. S. Sugars & Co., to have a sale of goods and other personalty by the firm to Robert Beachman declared fraudulent and void. The partnership consisted of J. S. Sugars and Geor- ' giana Beachman, the latter being the wife of Robert Beachman, appellant. The agreement for the sale was in writing, and is made exhibit “A” to deposition of Robert Beachman.
This agreement stipulated that the partnership be dissolved, . *453that each partner select one thousand dollars in value of the-goods as exempt property, and after taking out these exemptions the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hodges Bros. v. Coleman & CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Lehman, Durr & Co. v. Kelly & Bro.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Shealy v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
- Rankin & Co. v. Vandiver & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Marshall v. CroomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893