Legal Opinion

Castleberry v. Crisp

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided May 6, 1976No. 75-C-422-CPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

COOK, District Judge.

The Court has before it for consideration a petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by Kenneth Ray Castleberry. Petitioner attacks the validity of the judgment and sentence rendered by the District Court of Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma, in Case Nos. CRF-72-359, CRF-72-360 and CRF-72-361. After a trial by jury, petitioner was found guilty as to each charge of the crime of murder and his punishment was fixed at confinement in the state penitentiary for life as to each charge. The judgment and sentence were affirmed on direct…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Giles v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Anthony Rozelle Banks v. Dan M. Reynolds, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, McAlester Oklahoma Susan B. Loving, Attorney General of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Nauni v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. United States v. Donald SteffenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. People v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. BRAMLETT v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API