Legal Opinion

Blythe v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. Ex Rel. Ace Securities Corp. (In Re Blythe)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 2009No. 19-11481PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEPHEN RASLAVICH, Chief Judge. Introduction

Before the Court is the Defendant HSBC’s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint. The Plaintiffs oppose the motion. Briefs were submitted. A hearing on the matter was held on April 2, 2009. The Court next took the motion under advisement. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be granted in part and denied in part. 1

Factual Allegations

The Amended Complaint asserts causes of action under the federal Truth in Lending Act 2 and the Pennsylvania common law of contract. The following is alleged: In the Summer 1998 the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Gregory v. ChehiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Giza v. Amcap Mortgage, Inc. (In Re Giza)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  2. Calabria v. CIT Consumer Group (In Re Calabria)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API