Legal Opinion

In re Mort

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1990No. 90-598PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the board’s report and recommendation. In appeals to the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness, “[t]he burden of proof in such hearings shall be on the applicant to establish by clear and convincing evidence the applicant’s present character, fitness, and moral qualifications for admission to the practice of law in Ohio.” Gov. Bar R. I, Section 11(C)(6).

The record shows that Mort sought medical help in July 1987, because he felt severely depressed. At that time, Mort also described paranoid ideas and said he was experiencing auditory hallucinations. Dr. Grumet’s…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robert Rodriguez v. Robert Mitchell, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility, and Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. In re Application of SinghOhio Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API