Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Norman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 6, 1989PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The reason that we took this case was to consider whether jeopardy attaches under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution so as to bar a trial of the defendant in the Superior Court for armed robbery arising from the taking of a motor vehicle after he had been convicted in the District Court of larceny (a lesser included offense) of the same motor vehicle arising from the same taking. The Appeals Court decided that the bar of double jeopardy foreclosed a second trial in the Superior Court. 27 Mass. App. Ct. 82 (1989). We granted the Commonwealth’s application for further…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. MahoneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  3. Commonwealth v. NormanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HrycenkoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. CarlinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  3. Bynum v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. SpearMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  5. Edge v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API