Legal Opinion

Robertson Lumber Co. v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 15, 1907No. Nos. 14,983—(169)Published

Action in the district court for Polk county to recover $301.81 for goods sold. The case was tried before Watts, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of defendant Cameron Anderson, defendant Kenneth C. Hunter having defaulted. From an order denying a motion to set aside the verdlict and for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Per curiam

Action to recover from the defendants, as copartners, a-balance of $301.81 for lumber sold to them by the plaintiff. The defendant Anderson answered, and pleaded the statute of limitations, but his code-fendant madé default. The sole issue on the trial was whether a payment of $1 on the plaintiff’s account, made by the defendant Hunter, was received by it with notice that the copartnership theretofore existing between the defendants had been dissolved. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant Anderson, thereby necessarily finding, under 1 the charge of the court, that the plaintiff did…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robertson Lumber Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API