Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Katera's Kove, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 2015No. 464 C.D. 2015Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

The majority holds that Employer’s discharge of Claimant has to be evaluated exclusively under Section 402(e.l) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law),1 *805and I agree. I must respectfully dissent, however, from the majority’s Section 402(e.l) analysis. This Court’s standard of review tests the Board’s adjudication for legal error, and I find no error in the Board’s interpretation of Employer’s substance abuse policy as allowing for only random drug testing. Thus, I would defer to the Board and affirm its order.

As noted by the majority,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Turner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Kelley v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API