Legal Opinion

Estes v. Crawford

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 8, 1936No. A-9195PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.

This is an application for writ of prohibition for the purpose of prohibiting the district court of Hughes county and Tal Crawford, as judge thereof, from proceeding further in the trial of an information filed in said district court wherein petitioner and others are jointly charged with making false returns. Omitting formal parts, said information is as follows:

“Now comes Lee Warren Crutcher, the duly qualified and acting county attorney in and for Hughes county, state of Oklahoma, and gives the district court of Hughes county and state of Oklahoma to know and be informed that O. B. Harmon,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ikard v. Russell, JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Corley v. Adair County CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Jeter v. District Court of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Warner v. MathewsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. State v. YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SowardsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. State Ex Rel. Wester v. CaldwellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. State Ex Rel. Waters v. LackeyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. HigginsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Lawhorn v. RobertsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API