Legal Opinion

Moody & Tips Lumber Co. v. South Dallas Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 11, 1952No. 14463PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOND, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from an ancillary judgment in garnishment proceedings. The appellant, Moody & Tips Lumber Company, as plaintiff, initiated the primary suit against Buster Shelton for debt, and sued out writ of garnishment against South Dallas Bank & Trust Company. The garnishment writ was duly issued and served on the garnishee Bank, who first answered, admitting its indebtedness to the debtor Shelton in the sum of $407.69.

On October 9, 1950 the garnishment suit and the primary suit were dismissed “for want of prosecution” without limitation or reservation, and on that date…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Dowell v. WintersTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Hooker v. WilliamsonTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Williams v. HulingTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Carlton v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Glassman and Glassman v. SomozaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. George v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Collier Manufacturing & Supply, Inc. v. Interfirst Bank Austin, N.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Fourticq v. Fannin BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Laird v. JobesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API