Lindsay Tatusko v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Lindsay Tatusko appeals her convictions for forgery, a Class C felony, and theft, as a Class D felony, following a jury trial. Tatusko presents the following issues for our review:
1. Whether she was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel.
2. Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support her forgery conviction.
We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On November 12, 2011, Nicolette Lee purchased a meal at Logan’s Roadhouse (“Logan’s”) in Noblesville, and Tatusko was her server. The final bill for Lee’s meal was $14.37. Lee paid with a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bruce v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Wright v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Lindsey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Jewell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Quashawn Gentry v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016