Legal Opinion

IN RE RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided October 25, 2023No. 0:21-cv-01965Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re Resideo Technologies, Inc., Case No. 21-cv-1965 (WMW/ECW) Securities Litigation ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and the proposed Settlement Class, 1 seek final approval of settlement against Defendants Resideo Technologies, Inc. (Resideo); Michael G. Nefkens; Joseph D. Ragan, III; Niccolo de Masi; Paul Deninger; Roger Fradin; Jack Lazar; Nina Richardson; Andrew Teichl; and Sharon Weinbar. (Dkt. 42.) For the reasons addressed below, the Court finds good…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API