Trans Pacific Corporation, a District of Columbia Corporation v. South Seas Enterprises, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
In a diversity action for breach of contract, the court below dismissed plaintiff-appellant’s first amended complaint, for failure to join indispensable parties. This is an appeal from such decision. 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
A party is indispensable if his interest is such that a decree cannot be rendered that will not affect his interest, or if such party’s absence leaves the controversy in such a condition that its final determination is wholly inconsistent with equity and good conscience. Barney v. Baltimore City, 1867, 6 Wall. 280, 284, 73 U.S. 280, 284, 18 L.Ed. 825; De Korwin v. First Nat. Bank…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barney v. Baltimore CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Ward v. Deavers Young v. WardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
- Greenleaf v. Safeway Trails, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- De Korwin v. First Nat. Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- United States v. Maud L. ElferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
3Cited by8 opinions
- Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Siaca v. DCC Operating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Wolgin v. Atlas United Financial CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Reid v. Liberty Consumer Discount Co. of Pa.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Brackin Tie, Lumber & Chip Company, Inc. v. McLarty Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.