In re Tyler K.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the application of respondent for a further physical examination and psychological assessment of his 3 ^-year-old daughter, Brandy, nor did the court err in denying respondent’s request that Brandy either testify at trial or be interviewed in camera by the court (see, Matter of Jessica R., 78 NY2d 1031, 1033-1034; Matter of Stephanie A., 224 AD2d 1027, 1028, lv denied 88 NY2d 814; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N. Y. [Woodley B.] v Joseph B., 207 AD2d 885). Contrary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Nicole V.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Matter of JessicaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- In re Stephanie B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re Estina W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re Jessica N.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Colberdee C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re Ameillia RR.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Ameillia RR.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012