Jackson v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
Sammy S. Jackson asks us to reverse his conviction of robbery on two grounds. He first contends there is not sufficient corroboration of witnesses who testified to facts which would make them accomplices. We find the corroborating evidence sufficient.
About 11:00 a.m. on November 25, 1972, two men wearing ski masks robbed Kenneth Satterfield and others in the office of Satterfield Oil Company in Texarkana. One of the robbers brandished a pistol during the robbery. The two robbers, after causing Satterfield and the others to lie on the floor, walked directly into the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cawley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- State v. MathiasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Moore v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cassell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Tarry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Olles v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Dickerson Const. Co., Inc. v. DozierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Davlin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.