Legal Opinion

Yates v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 23, 1980No. F-79-691PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

We have consolidated the appeals from Oklahoma County District Court convictions in Case Nos. CRF-79-576, for Robbery With Firearms, and CRF-79-577, for Oral Sodomy, wherein punishment was fixed at twenty (20) years’ imprisonment and ten (10) years’ imprisonment respectively to be served consecutively. Appellant, Daniel Joseph Yates, hereinafter referred to as defendant asserts in his first assignment of error that his conviction for Oral Sodomy should be vacated for the reason that the testimony of victim J.G. was not sufficiently corroborated as required by 22 O.S.1971,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Dodson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Farrar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  5. Wade v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eberhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Gaines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Horton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API