Grohn v. Sisters of Charity Health Services Colorado
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge TAUBMAN.
In this wrongful termination of employment action, defendants, Sisters of Charity Health Services of Colorado and Centura Health Corporation, appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to stay proceedings and compel plaintiff, Carol A. Grohn, to arbitrate her claims. Because we conclude that arbitration is required, we reverse.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. § 1, et seq. (1994) requires arbitration of wrongful termination of employment claims, notwithstanding the holding in Lambdin v. District Court,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Arkansas Diagnostic Center, P.A. v. TahiriSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Meyer v. HaskettColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Giuliani v. Jefferson County Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- 1745 WAZEE LLC v. Castle Builders Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Byerly v. Kirkpatrick Pettis Smith Polian, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.