Legal Opinion

Marrero v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 31, 2003No. 2D03-2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

864 So.2d 1131 (2003)

Jose C. MARRERO, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 2D03-2006.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 31, 2003.

Jose C. Marrero, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine V. Blanco, Sr., Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent.

SALCINES, Judge.

Jose C. Marrero, in his petition filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c), raised two claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. In his first claim, Marrero alleged that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dillard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Fortner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Tippins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2013
  2. Marrero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API