Legal Opinion

Guardian Depositors Corp. v. Savage

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1938No. Docket No. 114, Calendar No. 40,221PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

As I understand the opinion of Chief Justice Wiest, the gist of his holding is: “The (mortgage) note remains the sole personal obligation;” notwithstanding the mortgagor’s specific covenant in the mortgage to pay the mortgage debt; and from this the conclusion is reached that suit on the obligation is barred by the six-year statute of limitations (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13976 [Stat. Ann. § 27.605]). No authorities supporting this conclusion are cited, and none have been called to our attention which squarely sustain it. Further, no good reason appears for holding that the mere simultaneous…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Michigan Insurance v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Harris v. MillsIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Earnshaw v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  4. State ex rel. Klemer v. City RecorderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Ogden v. BradshawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lincoln National Life Insurance v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Guardian Depositors Corp. v. PowersMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Swanson v. BennettSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  4. Schram v. CoyneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  5. Schram v. CoyneDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API