Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Steen
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
The Arkansas Highway Commission asserts that the judgment awarding the appellees $4,750 as compensation for the taking by eminent domain of 5.01 acres of land for construction on Highway 65 should be reversed because of the failure of the circuit judge to strike the testimony of one of the landowners and of a real estate broker who testified for appellees. Appellant also contends that the verdict is excessive and unsupported by substantial evidence. Since the alleged lack of substantial evidence is based upon the elimination of the testimony of these two witnesses,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fort Smith & Van Buren District v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. DuffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. Citizens Ice & Fuel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. McAlisterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- DIVISION OF ADMIN., ETC. v. SamterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. JensenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp. v. BoggsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
- Wilmoth v. Southwest Arkansas Utilities Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- Arkansas State Highway Commission v. LemleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.