Legal Opinion

State v. Vasquez

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2014No. 33,796 33,870PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOSSON, Justice.

{1} In a criminal prosecution, when the court suppresses the State’s evidence before trial, the State would be denied any appellate review if there were no mechanism for interlocutory appeal, because double jeopardy would bar a State’s appeal after trial. However, if the State were allowed to appeal every decision to suppress evidence, no matter how trivial, then interminable delays might prejudice the accused’s constitutional rights to a speedy trial and due process of law. To balance these important principles, our statutes require the State to certify to the district…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Govich v. North American Systems, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. VasquezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. AdamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State Human Svcs. Dep't v. LujanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. State v. AdamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API