Legal Opinion

Deer Lake Co. v. Michigan Land & Iron Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Marquette. (Stone, J.) Bill to quiet title to the marble and serpentine contained in certain lands. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This case was before this Court in October, 1890. 83 Mich. 11. After the determination of

that suit, complainant, on November 14, 1890, filed a .second bill. The testimony now shows that, immediately .after the commencement of the former suit, the Michigan Marble Company removed from the premises in question all its machinery and tools, and abandoned the work, leaving complainant in possession, and this was the situation when the present bill was filed.

The bill is. filed to quiet complainant’s title to the ■marble and serpentine contained in the W. -J of the S. W. of section 29, township 48…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Deer Lake Co. v. Michigan Land & Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Luse v. BoatmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. McCombs v. StephensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. McKinney's Heirs v. Cen. Ky. Nat. Gas. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. United States ex rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  5. Fisher v. Keweenaw Land Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API