Legal Opinion

Per & Melody Westerdal v. Name Intelligence, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 25, 2016No. 73434-2-I; 73536-5-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeach, J.

¶1 Per and Melody Westerdal appeal the trial court’s order terminating this receivership proceeding. They contend that the trial court should have first either disallowed or adjudicated their claim to 25 percent of a valuable receivership asset. Because the receivership had fulfilled its purpose and the trial court reasonably determined it would be wasteful and unnecessary to continue it, the trial court did not abuse its discretion terminating it. We affirm.

FACTS

¶2 Jay Westerdal owns Name Intelligence Inc., a company that buys and sells Internet domain names. Raymond Bero, a former employee,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bostain v. Food Express, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Cornu-Labat v. Hospital District No. 2Washington Supreme Court · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In The Receivership Of: Applied Restoration, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  2. In The Receivership Of: Castle Walls LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
  3. In The Receivership Of: Castle Walls LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
  4. Mary Ann Mccormick v. Timothy David KosnoffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. Westerdal v. Name Intelligence, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API