Legal Opinion
Garuba v. Yorkshire Insurance
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided June 15, 1943No. 46284PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
There is only one question presented to us here: Was appellee the owner of the ear at the time of the loss? The trial court held that he was still the owner because there had been no record transfer of title under the provisions of chapter 251.1 of the Code of Iowa, 1939, particularly sections 5002.0.1 to 5002.07. The court said:
“As to the legal point as to whether the car had in fact been sold or not, our statute provides a method and only one method for the transfer of title to a motor vehicle and the turning of this car over to the prospective purchaser who made the deposit of $200 without…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Craddock v. BickelhauptSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- Tigue Sales Co. v. Reliance Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Cerex Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Abraham v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- Calhoun v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York v. FriedleyDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
- Kirk v. MadsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Union Bank & Trust Co. of Stanwood v. WilleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
- Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.