United States v. Fiske
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
BLOMMERS, Judge:
Following arraignment, trial defense counsel requested that the hearing be closed “due to the nature of some information that will come out during the trial.” Ascertaining that the appellant understood his constitutional right to a public trial, that he desired to waive that right, and that the Government had no objection, the military judge granted the defense request. Spectators were barred from the remainder of the proceedings.1
This is the second case we are aware of in this decade that a military judge has closed an Air Force court-martial trial without a reason…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BaylessOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- United States v. TraversUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. CianfraniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. StoryU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. SherwoodUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020