Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1973No. 2-772A38PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Defendant-Appellant Paul Johnson was convicted of possession of heroin (Count 1) and possession of narcotics paraphernalia, i.e., needle, cooker and eyedropper (Count 2) following trial by the court without a jury. Johnson seeks reversal because of admission of “tainted” evidence resulting from an alleged warrantless arrest and an unreasonable search and seizure.

The evidence most favorable to the State reveals that on November 30, 1970, Indianapolis police officers Brenton and Mukes received information from an informant that Johnson had heroin in his possession at 2161 North Meridian Street…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Moreno v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Grzesiowski v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Moss v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Romack v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Turner v. Sheriff of Marion CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API