Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Norcross

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 21, 1948No. C. A. No. 36291PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGUIRE, District Judge.

I cannot conclude that the alleged mark “Susie Cucumber” is confusingly similar to the co-defendant Norcross’ registered trade-mark, as one is for letters and the other for greeting cards which are purchased over the counter, while the letters have to be ordered.

However, plaintiff’s suit must be dismissed for the reason that the name ■“Susie Cucumber” is incapable of registration as a trade-mark, since it is used as plaintiff’s pseudonym and signature and not as a true trade-mark. This case is disposed of it seems to me by In re Page Co., 47 App.D.C. 195.

The words…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Page Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daggett & Ramsdell, Inc. v. MarzallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1954
  2. First Draft, Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API