Legal Opinion

United States v. McIntosh

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 27, 2009No. 08-15449PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents the question whether a defendant whose conviction has not been vacated may be indicted again for the same offenses without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause because the government obtained a dismissal of the original indictment after the defendant pleaded guilty to it. James LeRay McIntosh pleaded guilty to an indictment that alleged drug and firearm charges, and the district court unconditionally accepted his plea. Before sentencing, the government discovered that the indictment alleged the wrong date of the offenses, obtained from another grand…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. Soto (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  2. United States v. Terance Martez GambleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. James LeRay McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Haynes v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API