Legal Opinion

Durham Shopping Center, Inc. v. Orco, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 4, 1984No. 8414SC239Published

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant contends the trial court erred in holding him liable under the guaranty since the lease he guaranteed was either superseded by other leases or materially altered in its terms. Defendant argues that the greater weight of the evidence shows that plaintiff entered into lease agreements with Bambino’s International, Inc., or Andrews, thereby discharging defendant’s liability as guarantor. This argument does not present an issue for review as the trial court’s findings are conclusive on appeal when supported by any competent evidence. The trial court found that no lease…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eli E. Deal v. . D.C. CochranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  2. Crouse v. . StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Better Advertising, Inc. v. PeaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API