Legal Opinion
Security Farms v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffers, Warehousemen & Helpers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 22, 1997No. Nos. 95-15171, 95-15237, 95-15296, 96-15563, 96-15648, 96-15649 and 96-15686PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
This opinion springs from controversies possible only in a highly specialized, vertically integrated industry, heavily dependent on relatively low skilled agricultural workers, whom a strong international union seeks to organize, and in which each major party is more than amply represented by members of the legal profession. The opinion thus reflects both the soil of California and the intense competitiveness of its people.
This case involves three defendants and three separate but related appeals. The appeals derive from Security Farms’ and other agricultural growers’…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Frelin v. Oakwood Homes Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2003
- Security Farms El Dorado Farms Manriquez & Acuna, Inc. Higashi Farms, Inc. Pisoni Farms, a California Corporation v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffers, Warehousemen & Helpers, an Unincorporated Association, Security Farms El Dorado Farms Manriquez & Acuna, Inc. Higashi Farms, Inc. Pisoni Farms, a California Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffers, Warehousemen & Helpers, an Unincorporated Association, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Security Farms El Dorado Farms Manriquez & Acuna, Inc. Higashi Farms, Inc. Pisoni Farms, a California Corporation v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffers, Warehousemen & Helpers, an Unincorporated Association, and Teamsters Joint Council No. 7, in Re: General Teamsters, Warehousemen and Helpers Union Local 890, Debtor, Debtor-In-Possession, Security Farms El Dorado Farms Manriquez & Acuna, Inc. Higashi Farms, Inc. Pisoni Farms, a California Corporation, Freitas Farms San Ysidro Farms v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffers, Warehousemen & Helpers, an Unincorporated Association, and General Teamsters, Warehousemen and Helpers Union Local 890, Security Farms El Dorado Farms Manriquez & Acuna, Inc. Higashi Farms, Inc. Pisoni Farms, a California Corporation, Freitas Farms San Ysidro Farms v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffers, Warehousemen & Helpers, an Unincorporated Association, and General Teamsters, Warehousemen and Helpers Union Local 890, Security Farms El Dorado Farms Manriquez & Acuna, Inc. Higashi Farms, Inc. Pisoni Farms, a California Corporation, Freitas Farms San Ysidro Farms v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffers, Warehousemen & Helpers, an Unincorporated Association, Security Farms El Dorado Farms Manriquez & Acuna, Inc. Higashi Farms, Inc. Pisoni Farms, a California Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffers, Warehousemen & Helpers, an Unincorporated Association, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, and General Teamsters, Warehousemen and Helpers Union Local 890, Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Abrams v. PG&E CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
- C & A, S.E. v. Puerto Rico Solid Waste Management Authority (In re C & A, S.E.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2006