Legal Opinion

Haas v. Texas Employment Commission

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 20, 1984No. 05-83-00561-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHUMPERT, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment upholding a Texas Employment Commission decision that appellant Haas was not entitled to unemployment benefits because he was guilty of misconduct at work. We agree with the trial court that there was substantial evidence to support the Commission’s decision, and consequently, we affirm.

Texas Employment Commission decisions are reviewed under the “substantial evidence trial de novo” standard. TEX. REY. Cl V.STAT. ANN. art. 6252-13a § 21(g) (Vernon Supp.1984); Texas Employment Commission v. Bell Helicopter International Inc., 627 S.W.2d 524, 526…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lewis v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Texas Employment Commission v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Texas Employment Commission v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. City of Dallas v. Texas Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Potts v. Texas Employment Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  2. Mary Lee Foundation v. Texas Employment CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Direct Communications, Inc. v. Lunsford, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995
  4. New Boston General Hospital, Inc. v. Texas Workforce Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  5. Hernandez v. Texas Workforce Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API